Tuesday, 13 September 2016

CORRUPTION IS STILL ALIVE AND KICKING IN LABOUR PARTY LED-HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL


Tuesday, 13 September 2016

Update of the Article published on Monday 12th September 2016.
CORRUPTION IS ALIVE AND KICKING IN LABOUR PARTY LED-HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL
More Evidence of Misconduct-for Peter Devlin –Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Council-to Ignore- & Brush under the Carpet-as Normal- to protect some of his colleagues –particularly Richard Trow- in the Planning Department-and –Hilary Martin & Alyson Carman-in the Legal Department of Hartlepool Borough Council-
The criteria for the unlawful decision-taken by Alan H Smith-assistant Land Registrar-Durham- to remove property details-from our Registered Land Title- CE74844 “Absolute” we purchased in all good faith from Hartlepool Borough Council on the 1stFebruary 1984- pursuant to the Housing Act 1980- in consideration of £5.750.00 –(Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds) can only be-based NOT on the LAW  of the Property Registration Act-but on “his personal  opinion” which is pure speculation- (speculation) -as we all know- is the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm irrefutable evidence-to support such a claim- but relies on the  spurious-claim-made by  the B141 applicants- when  stated categorically-( in a way that is unambiguously explicit and direct: ) in his signed and dated letter to us on the 3rd December 2008-that the area of land in question-was originally conveyed to Mr/Mrs Benison-by the Mayor-Aldermen and Burgess  of the County Borough of Hartlepool in November 1972  -
It Is My Understanding Obtained From My Research Of The Internet that in Accordance to The Land Registration Act1925,Land Registration-Act 2002, Law Of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989-
Land Registry’s Only Remit- is To Record All The Information Conveyed To Them By The Solicitors Acting On Behalf Of The Sellers Or Buyers Of The Property-Land Registry- Have No Legal Remit-Or Legal Authority Whatsoever-To Alter Any Of The Details Submitted for Registration Of Any-Land /Property Bought Or Sold-By Conveyancing / Solicitors-
It is disappointing though hardly surprising-or unexpected- that-Land Registry-Durham the recipients -of my request-for a copy of this Alleged Conveyance between the Mayor- Aldermen and–Burgesses of Hartlepool Council- &-Mr/Mrs Bennison-in November 1972- have found themselves unable to provide authentic proof of such a conveyance- could it possibly be-that- my previous protests-of misconduct in public office- are  justified-that NO-repeat NO Evidence-Exists-of any Previous Conveyance between the Mayor Aldermen and–Burgesses of Hartlepool Council- & Mr/Mrs Bennison-had ever taken place- in November 1972-
Alan H Smith-the assistant Land REGISTRAR- Durham (a Government Official in Public Office-) appears determined to pursue this ludicrous claim by the B141 applicants- despite the irrefutable evidence-that it is a fraudulent claim-and outside his Remit- disputes of property ownership can only be settled in a Court of Law-
Is that not a clear deliberate case of Misconduct In Public Office-by the assistant Land Registrar-Alan H Smith-and sufficient evidence-to show-he an assistant Land REGISTRAR- Conspired with the B141 applicants- and Officials of Hartlepool Borough Council- Planning & Legal Departments-to obtain property by Criminal Deception- and to Pervert the Course of Justice- FRAUD-as defined in the FRAUD Act. 2006
(a)
“Fraud by false representation” is defined by Section-2-of the Act-as a case where a person makes “any representation as to fact or law-…expressed or implied- which they know to be untrue or misleading-( i.e. Alan H Smith’s claim-in his letter to us- signed and dated 3rd December 2008- that a conveyance of the property-had previously taken place between Mr/Mrs Bennison- and the Mayor-Aldermen and Burgesses of the County Borough of Hartlepool-in November 1972)
(b)
“Fraud by abuse of position” is defined by Section 4-of the Act-as a case where a person occupies a position- i.e. assistant Land Registrar-Durham -a Public Office-where they are expected- to safeguard the financial interests of another person- and abuses that position- this includes cases where the abuse consisted of an omission- rather than an overt act—In all classes of Fraud-it requires that for an offence to have occurred- the person must have acted dishonestly- and that they acted- with the intent of making a gain for themselves-or anyone else- i.e. Mr/Mrs Bennison-or inflicting a loss-or risk of loss-on another- i.e. the legal registered owners of the property-Alan Harvey Flounders and his Wife- Jacqueline Flounders-
You can’t hide your misconduct in Public Office for ever Peter- Devlin-you have been exposed-as unfit for office-by me-Alan Harvey Flounders-

"If anything I have written is untrue or slanderous- no-doubt Peter-Devlin will commence legal proceedings against me- I await your possible threat of litigation with pleasure-and anticipation-

It is also- my understanding- if you are going to Court in a litigation against your neighbour, and if your neighbour's case relies upon information contained in a Title Deed, then the Law- requires him/her to disclose that Title Deed-to us-(in fact -he/she- is required to disclose to us- any evidence- on which they seek to rely on)-particularly the alleged  Conveyance-supposedly made- between Mr/Mrs Bennison & the Mayor-Aldermen & Burgesses of County Borough of Hartlepool- in November 1972- surely this legal ruling-must also apply to Hartlepool Borough Council- the original “Sellers” of the ex-council house- No Council can Legally sell the same piece of Freehold Property to Two ( 2) separate individuals-that must be Misconduct & Fraud-in Public Office

“It is vital that the public have confidence in their public officials and in the legal framework that sets the boundaries of their conduct. The offence of misconduct in public office-is a Criminal Offence-
There is urgent need to ensure that public officials are appropriately held to account for misconduct committed in connection with their official duties.”
Strange and highly suspicious when one considers that despite numerous requests for a copy of this controversial document of–Conveyance-to confirm the authenticity of Alan H Smith’s - statement our requests for a copy-of the Conveyance  allegedly made- in 1972- have been ignored-
If he Alan H Smith- and Land Registry-Durham- isn't able to ascertain the truth of a previous conveyance-having taken place-between –Mr/Mrs Benninson and the Mayor- Aldermen- and Burgesses of the County Borough of Hartlepool in November 1972- which-he had clearly and enthusiastically supported-previously- as sufficient evidence to alter some of our registered details on Land Title CE74844 “Absolute” -then he most certainly shouldn't be holding a public office in a government department-as an assistant Land Registrar-of Land Registry Durham-

Monday, 12 September 2016

CORRUPTION IS ALIVE AND KICKING IN LABOUR PARTY LED-HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL


Monday, 12 September 2016
More Evidence of Misconduct-for Peter Devlin –Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Council-to Ignore- & Brush under the Carpet-as Normal- to protect some of his colleagues –particularly Richard Trow- in the Planning Department-and Hilary Martin & Alyson Carman-in the Legal Department of Hartlepool Borough Council-
The criteria for the unlawful decision-taken by Alan H Smith-assistant Land Registrar-Durham- to remove property details- from our registered Land Title- CE74844 “Absolute”  we purchased in all good faith from Hartlepool Borough Council on the 1st February 1984- pursuant to the Housing Act 1980- in consideration of £5.750.00 –(Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds) can only be- the spurious-claim-made by Alan H Smith- Assistant Land REGISTRAR- Durham-who stated categorically-in his signed and dated letter to us on the 3rd December 2008-that the area of land in question- was originally conveyed to Mr/Mrs Benison-by the Mayor-Aldermen and Burgess  of the County Borough of Hartlepool in November 1972  -
It is disappointing -though hardly surprising or unexpected – that the recipients -Land Registry-Durham-for a copy of this Alleged Conveyance between the Mayor- Aldermen and–Burgesses of Hartlepool Council- & Mr/Mrs Bennison-in November 1972- have found themselves unable to provide any  - authentic proof of such a conveyance- could it possibly be-that- My previous protests  are  justified- that NO- repeat NO Evidence- Exists- of any  Previous Conveyance between the Mayor Aldermen and–Burgesses of Hartlepool Council- & Mr/Mrs Bennison-had ever taken place- in November 1972-
Alan H Smith-the assistant Land REGISTRAR- Durham (a Government Official in Public Office-) appears determined to pursue this ludicrous claim by the B141 applicants- despite the irrefutable evidence-that it is a fraudulent claim-
Is that not a clear deliberate case of Misconduct In Public Office-by the assistant Land Registrar-Alan H Smith-and sufficient evidence-to show-that he an assistant Land REGISTRAR- Conspired with the B141 applicants- and the named- Officials of Hartlepool Borough Council- Planning & Legal Departments-to obtain property by Criminal Deception- and to Pervert the Course of Justice- FRAUD-as defined in the FRAUD Act. 2006
(a)
“Fraud by false representation” is defined by Section-2-of the Act-as a case where a person makes “any representation as to fact or law-…expressed or implied- which they know to be untrue or misleading-( i.e. Alan H Smith’s -categorically stated-in his letter to us- signed and dated 3rd December 2008- that a conveyance of the property-had previously taken place between Mr/Mrs Bennison- and the Mayor-Aldermen and Burgesses of the County Borough of Hartlepool-in November 1972)
(b)
“Fraud by abuse of position” is defined by Section 4-of the Act-as a case where a person occupies a position- i.e. assistant Land Registrar-Durham -a Public Office-where they are expected- to safeguard the financial interests of another person- and abuses that position- this includes cases where the abuse consisted of an omission- rather than an overt act—
In all classes of Fraud-it requires that for an offence to have occurred- the person must have acted dishonestly- and that they acted- with the intent of making a gain for themselves-or anyone else- i.e. Mr/Mrs Bennison-or inflicting a loss-or risk of loss-on another- i.e. the legal registered owners of the property-Alan Harvey Flounders and his Wife- Jacqueline Flounders-

You can’t hide your misconduct in Public Office for ever Peter Devlin-you have been exposed- as unfit for office- by me-Alan Harvey Flounders-
I await your threat of litigation –with pleasure- after all-if you were to produce any evidence- which- I doubt- that a property conveyance-had taken place in November 1972- as categorically claimed by- Alan H Smith- assistant Land Registrar- in his signed and dated letter to us on the 3rd December 2008-it would prove your predecessor J-Anthony Brown- was himself- part of a greater conspiracy-to pervert the course of justice-





There is no need to remind you -the Chief Solicitor- of Hartlepool Borough Council- that you will have to produce in Court -the Conveyance documents to prove or disprove-that a previous conveyance of the property in question- was originally conveyed to Mr/Mrs Benison-by the Mayor-Aldermen and Burgess of the County Borough of Hartlepool in November 1972 –as categorically claimed by Alan H Smith- assistant Land Registrar-Durham-
You can’t hide your misconduct in Public Office for ever Peter- Devlin-you have been exposed- as unfit for office- by me-Alan Harvey Flounders- I await your threat of litigation -with pleasure-

There is no need to remind you -the Chief Solicitor- of Hartlepool Borough Council- that you will have to produce in Court -the Conveyance documents to prove or disprove-that a previous conveyance of part of the property in question-Registered Title CE74844 "Absolute" -purchased by us-in all good faith-  on the 1st February 1984- pursuant to the Housing Act 1980-in Consideration of £5,750.00. (Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds-)was originally conveyed to Mr/Mrs Benison-by the Mayor-Aldermen and Burgess  of the County Borough of Hartlepool in November 1972 -categorically claimed by Alan H Smith- assistant Land Registrar-Durham- in his signed and dated letter to us on the 3rd December 2008-

Copies:-
Iain Wright- Member of Parliament for Hartlepool-
 
 
 
 
 
 

Sunday, 28 August 2016

“If you fight you might lose-BUT if you don’t fight-you will always lose”- Bob Crow-1961-2014-


“If you fight you might lose-BUT if you don’t fight-you will always lose”-
BOB CROW-1961-2014-love him or hate him- his words NOT -mine-I believe were spot on the money-and it fits all occasions-of life- and can never be challenged-“ be honest-isn’t what BOB CROW

Sunday 28/8/2016
Another letter to day-to my Labour Member of Parliament for Hartlepool- Iain Wright- to remind him my campaign to expose the Criminal Corruption –that still exists-in BOTH Hartlepool Labour Controlled Council and in Land Registry Durham Continues-Even without his HELP- who accepted- the ridiculous explanation-made by the Head of Land Registry-  that the original property plans had been destroyed- 
 

THE LETTER– RECENTLY DISCOVERED- FROM LAND REGISTRY-DURHAM-14TH OCTOBER 2008-PROVES MY ALLEGATIONS THAT CRIMINAL CORREPTION  STILL EXISTS IN BOTH HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL & LAND REGISTRY DURHAM-
To say we were surprised to receive a letter from Land Registry Durham--to alter some of the registered and recorded details-of our estate-Land Deeds CE74844 “Absolute FIRST registered on the 29th March 1984- -some 24 years ago- by the Chief Solicitor-of Hartlepool Borough Council-J Anthony Brown after we purchased it-in all good faith-the ex-council house freehold land & property Registered Title- CE74844 “Absolute” from Hartlepool Borough Council-on the 1st February 1984-pursuant to the Housing Act 1980-in consideration of £5,750.00.(Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds ) would be an understatement!-
We were absolutely shocked-amazed and devastated to receive such an outrageous- spurious letter from the assistant land Registrar-Alan H Smith- Durham--a Senior Position of Trust and Authority-employed by a Government Department Land Registry-Durham- informing us- that our immediate next door neighbours Mr/Mrs E Bennison had submitted -a-B141 application –to Land Registry-Durham- to alter some of the details recorded on our-Registered Ex-Council House Freehold Property-Title CE74844 "Absolute"
 
Please Note--
This class of title “Absolute” will only be granted by Land Registry-IF-when the title is “FIRST” presented for “Registration” in this case 29th March 1984- the person applying for “Registration” (J. Anthony Brown ) Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council- the “Sellers” of the Property-can (show an “Unbroken” chain of “Ownership” going back at least- 15 Years- this is undoubtable evidence confirming that a search had been undertaken-following the exchange of contracts- in order to allow time to deal with any issues which may arise- this clearly supports our belief- that NO previous "Conveyance or Purchase" -of any part- of our registered freehold property CE74844 “Absolute” had previously take place between Mr/Mrs E Bennison and the Hartlepool Borough Council- in November 1972- falsely claimed by the assistant-Land Registrar-Alan H Smith- in his letter to us-dated 3rd December 2008- it beggars belief that someone in a Senior position of trust and authority in Public Office of Land Registry- could allow himself to be party to an obvious fraudulent B141 application-containing a  spurious document claiming falsely that they have title to that piece of lands on which-they had illegally erected their kitchen extension and Toilet-without seeking Planning Permission-causing serious structural damage- to a neighbours private property-
Please note-
if you are going to Court in a litigation against your neighbour which must also include Hartlepool Borough Council- the "Sellers" of the Estate- and if your neighbour's or Hartlepool Borough Council's case relies upon information contained in a title deed, then the law requires him to disclose that title deed to you (in fact, he is required to disclose to you any evidence on which he seeks to rely in his case.

Despite numerous requests to Land Registry to supply an Official Copy-as proof- of this conveyance or purchase-having taken place between Mr/Mrs Bennison and the Mayor- Aldermen and Burgesses of the County Borough of Hartlrepool-in November 1972-(at a time –it should be noted- of a critical shortage of Council House property- for sale to sitting tenants--without- I believe- Special- approval of the Government Housing Ministers personal approval-) No such Official Copy- has been received- ?
It must also be remembered-that we had proved- beyond reasonable doubt- our irrefutable purchase and ownership-of the freehold property registered Title CE74844 “Absolute” to Mr/Mrs E Bennison’s complete satisfaction-only two (2) months previously –at the meeting held in our home--on Monday11th August 2008 at Mr/Mrs E Bennison’s special request to examine –inspect and compare-BOTH sets of Registered Land Title Deeds to clarify legal ownership of the freehold property on which Mr/Mrs E Bennison’s had illegally erected-without –seeking Council planning permission their unfinished kitchen extension and attached to our outside detached wash house property causing severe structural damage-preventing the legal property owners family the safe use of their wash house clothes washing facilities
 
This latest–desperate-outrageous- dishonest attempt- by our immediate next door neighbours Mr/Mrs E Bennison-was obviously designed- to gain by criminal deception part -ownership-of land and property they knew they had never purchased from Hartlepool Borough Council in 1972.-but had built-a kitchen and toilet extension onto the property-–without seeking council planning permission-or the legal property owns consent- causing severe structural damage- was obviously another last desperate attempt- unsupported by any legal documentation of purchase- or evidence of a previous conveyance made-between Officials of Hartlepool Borough Council and Mr/Mrs E Bennison in November 1972-as claimed by Alan H Smith- assistant Land Registrar Durham-
This was–in my view- a spurious claim designed to avoid at all costs the expensive demolition of their illegally built kitchen and toilet extension attached to and causing severe structural damage to their immediate neighbours detached wash house property-plus-the additional costs of repairing the damage already done to their neighbour’s private property-
 
Please Note-for the record-I am still awaiting an answer -from Peter Devlin- the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Council- to  my allegation of Planning Corruption by Council Officials -is it possible -he himself is part of the Problem-his silence would suggest some involvement .
 
The contents of the B141 letter –-dated 14th October 2008--from Alan H Smith- assistant Land REGISTRAR-a senior Government Official employed in a position of trust and authority-in- Public Office -a Government Department of Land Registry- Durham-was NOT –as one-would have been expected-- a copy of-the PROPERTY CONVEYANCE -claimed to have been made between Mr/Mrs E Bennison and Hartlepool Council in November 1972-but a general Drawing -No. SP.78985 stamped & dated October-1971 –showing part of theWest-View-Council Housing-Estate- a time it MUST be noted when BOTH- Social Council House properties-46/48 Ridlington Way-West View-were-exclusively owned- by Hartlepool Council-Social Housing-and occupied by two (2) separate –unrelated- weekly Rent Paying Council House families-it is NOT an Land Registry-"official Copy" of a Tile Plan-it does not give an description of the property purchased -i.e the address-it does NOT clearly identify the extent of the plot within the title which is being transferred-and in my view-cannot be considered  at law- to be definitive proof-of purchase-and cannot- and would not-be accepted- by any stretch of imagination-in any British Court of Law-or Land Registry themselves- as substantive evidence of proof of -Purchase of the either Council House Properties- 46/48 Ridlington Way-or Transfer of Ownership or proof-of- any Conveyancing- made- between Mr/Mrs E Bennison and the Mayor-Aldermen-and Burgesses of the County Borough of Hartlepool-in 1972-  enthusiastically claimed to have taken place by Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar-Durham- it is in my view- a false document- deliberately designed to misinform-and deceive -it is NOT registered-and therefore-in my view- is not protected under the law -a close examination of plan No.SP.78985 stamped & dated October-1971- shows quite clearly an amateur attempt had been made to alter the boundary details shown in red- on the general plan- this can be easily seen and confirmed when compared with the original and genuine plan of this particular area- detailed-plan- No-M44684- Title-“Sale of Council House” Dated September 1983- counter signed-by the Mayor of Hartlepool J Jones-and the Chief Executive-N.S. Abrahams  -affixed with corporate common seal of Hartlepool-Borough Council dated 3/11/1974- which contradicts the claim made by Alan H Smith-the assistant Land Registrar-Durham- in October 2008- and repeated-again in December 2008- that the Mayor of Hartlepool-Aldermen and Burgesses of the County Borough of Hartlepool-had sold the same piece of land and property to the B141 applicants in November 1972-an obvious spurious unlawful attempt-to deliberately deceive -confuse mislead and cause further anguish distress and harassment to the two (2) elderly law abiding–tax-paying-innocent legal Registered Property Owners !
Please Note-Peter  Devlin-
Surely it is Illegal to sell the same piece of land-twice- would have thought- the Chief  Solicitor- of Hartlepool- who sold us the Land and Property- would be a little concerned-  no doubt he can explain the situation to the Cleveland Police- who- incidentally-have still NOT acknowledged my request for a Criminal Investigation  into my Allegations of Misconduct in Public- Office-
 
Some people might be very intimidated –if not-frightened by such a letter from a Land Registry-Official-in Public Office- and think-although they were completely innocent of any wrongdoing- they might needlessly worry-that they may have committed a criminal offence!-especially when informed by the very same assistant land registrar- Alan H Smith-there is NO right to appeal in respect of this decision- although you may be able to challenged-the decision-by applying for judicial review- this is an extremely difficult process and I suggest that you obtain legal advice-IF-this is something that you may wish to pursue-
This is Un-becoming disgraceful behaviour from an assistant Land Registrar- employed-in Public Office-in-a government department-of Land Registry- the very same person-WHO- in December 2008- at a meeting held in the Offices of Land Registry-Durham- Rejected As Unacceptable-Groundless And Irrelevant- our Land Registry-“Official Copy” of-the Purchase -from Hartlepool Council in February 1984- Pursuant to the Housing Act 1980 and in Consideration of -£5,750.00- “Five Thousand Seven Hundred And Fifty Pounds-the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged by Hartlepool Borough Council-hereinafter-called the (Transferor) as beneficial owner hereby Conveys to ALAN HARVEY FLOUNDERS and JACQUELINE FLOUNDERS his WIFE-the Land Shown and Edged-with RED-on the Official Title Plan bound up within and with the Dwelling House-and Other Buildings-thereon known as Number 48 Ridlington Way-Hartlepool -Purchased- conveyed-transferred recorded-filed-and Registered-with Land Registry Durham- in Both-the-Property and Proprietorship Registers-by-J.ANTHONY BROWN- Chief Solicitor-of Hartlepool Borough Council-on the-29th-3-1984-
BUT-it is to be noted- that Alan H Smith-assistant Land Registrar-Durham-in a letter to us dated 3rd December 2008- -willingly accepted as stronger proof of purchase-a spurious claim made-by a B141 Applicant- stating that a conveyance of part of the registered ex council house property-Title CE74844 “Absolute” had previously been made between the B141 applicants-Me/Mrs E Bennison- by the Mayor –Aldermen- -and Burgesses of the County Borough of Hartlepool-in November 1972-
-However-the same area of land was, according to Alan H Smith- together with other land-conveyed to you on the 1st February-1984-by Hartlepool borough council—Alan H Smith-further states- as the Council had previously sold off the Land in 1972-it could NOT-subsequently have included it in a conveyance to you in 1984-tThis means that Mr/Mrs Bennison- have the Better-Documentary title to the land than you-
Despite numerous request to Land Registry-to produce an “Official Copy” of this mysterious conveyance of part of the registered ex council house property-Title CE74844 “Absolute” previously- made between the B141 applicants-Mr/Mrs E Bennison- by the Mayor Aldermen- and Burgesses of the County Borough of Hartlepool-in November 1972- have been unsuccessful-

a clear indication –that no such previous conveyance had ever taken place-between Mr/Mrs Bennison  between and the Mayor –Aldermen- and Burgesses of the County Borough of Hartlepool-in November 1972- I honestly believe that this despicable conduct is without doubt-Misconduct in Public Office- a criminal offence- designed to pervert the course of justice-Fraud- has defined by section 4 of the Fraud Act 2006-
It should be also be remembered and most certainly NOT forgotten-that Mr/Mrs E Bennison-had been unable to produce any documentation whatsoever-to dispute or challenge our registered ownership-of Land Title CE74844 “Absolute” at the meeting convened at Mr/Mrs E Bennison- specific request in our home- on August 11th 2008- a clear indication –if any further evidence was needed-that our immediate next door neighbours was now quite desperate-with the help and assistance of Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar-and Anthony Lowes of Land Registry Durham to claim by criminal deception property ALL knew was NOT and never had been in the ownership of the B141 applicant- simply to avoid the heavy financial costs of demolition of their unfinished kitchen and toilet extension-  attached to our property and causing severe structural criminal damage-
 
•It should also be noted-that according to the B141 application- made by our immediate next door neighbours Mr/Mrs E Bennison dated 14th October 2008- -and accepted without hesitation- by Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar- -Durham-they ONLY disputed part ownership-of the small area of our detached outbuildings- edged in BLUE- described –by the B141 applicants- as an outside toilet-for use of their employed-taxi drivers- a statement that clearly indicates- that the ownership of the remainder of the registered-detached Wash-House outbuildings-on which the B141 applicant- had previously trespassed and illegally erected their unfinished kitchen extension and attached it to our property- causing severe structural- criminal damage-was NOT- repeat NOT –DISPUTED- or challenged- and therefore remained in our registered Land Title-CE74844 “Absolute”-as a letter from Land Registry Confirms-
Is that not –shooting themselves in the foot- a clear self- confession if any further proof was needed- that they knew-their planning applications H/2008/0467 later changed to Retrospective Planning application H/2009/0568 first submitted to Hartlepool Council in August 2008- containing ownership documents A.B.C.D. was- fraudulent-a clear breach of sections 65(5) and section 65(6) a statutory requirement of the Town &Country Planning Act 1990- fully intending- at a later date to claim IMMUNITY from planning enforcement under the four year rule of the Town And Country Planning Act 1990- a spurious claim- later very vigorously supported by
 Paul Burgon- Hartlepool Borough Council’s Enforcement Officer another clear indication-that he too- committed misconduct in public office- and was part of a greater orchestrated conspiracy to pervert the course of justice-
Alan Harvey Flounders

    

Sunday, 14 August 2016

NEVER GIVE UP-



I owe my continued determination to expose the Corruption festering away in the bowels of Hartlepool Labour Dominated Council- to BOB CROW-1961-2014-love him or hate him- his words NOT -mine-I believe were spot on the money-and it fits all occasions-of life- and can never be challenged-“ be honest-isn’t what BOB CROW said-the TRUTH.
“If you fight you might lose-BUT if you don’t fight-you will always lose”-

I believe that the official copy-from Land Registry and our solicitors- Levinson Walker and Lister-of the original document of purchase-–dated 14th February 1984-confirming the purchase and transfer-of the ex-council house freehold property “address removed”-in all good faith-Pursuant to The Housing Act 1980- in consideration of £5,750.00 Five Thousand Seven Hundred And Fifty Pounds-and the title plan-M44-684-“sale of council house” -showing the total expanse of the land being purchased-and transferred- on the 1st February 1984-from Hartlepool Borough Council- clearly identifies -the extent of the plot within the title–edged in red-is- I honestly believe-sufficient documentary evidence-to be Considered at Law- as- the Definitive Proof of Purchase-and  Ownership for the Registered Freehold property-Title CE74844 “Absolute” this Overwhelming- irrefutable legally accepted- proof- of purchase-was- rejected by Alan H Smith-assistant Land Registrar Durham- as “Groundless and Irrelevant- but-he- was quite willing and enthusiastic- to accept a spurious land drawing dated 1971- when both council  social house properties-where-in the ownership of the local council-including- two coloured photographs of an outside toilet door-one in the open position and the other in the closed position- as greater proof of purchase of property -from Hartlepool Borough Council- in 1972-eight (8) prior to the Right to buy law- introduced in 1980- IF-that is not indicative or a least highly suspicious of fraud-& Misconduct–in Public Office –by Alan H Smith-I don’t know what is-and  may prove a little difficult if NOT impossible for him to explain-I am still awaiting any acknowledgement of my e-mail –to Cleveland Police to consider commencing a criminal investigation into my formal complaint and allegations  of Misconduct in Public Office –further information on political corruption- can be read here- http://alanflounders.blog or just “GOGGLE” the Coffin Dodger!                                                                        

Friday, 22 July 2016

AN OUTSTANDING EXAMPLE OF A LABOUR PARTY HYPORCRITE


Friday, 22 July 2016
Definition- of -a Hypocrite-a pretence of having a virtuous character, moral- socialist beliefs  principles, etc., that he does not really possess. See more.
There was a report broadcast on T.V. to-day- highlighting the activities of the Hartlepool Member of Parliament-Iain Wright-criticizing the Scandalous   Disgraceful behaviour of Mike Ashley-owner of the sports firm-and also owner of Newcastle Football Club- whether Mike Ashley is a Complete scoundrel I know Not- what I do know is that Iain Wright- the Labour Party Representative in the Palace of Westminster for the People of Hartlepool -is a complete “Hypercrite” who- in my view- and I believe many others- will do anything to gain public support- give interviews- make silly comments-anything- but what he is paid to do- represent his own town constituents-
Most people will find it difficult to believe that- Members of Parliament and Town Councillors need NO qualifications whatsoever- NO basic educational or even any work experience-and many don’t have any skills that would help them to do their job, what many Hartlepool Labour Councillors do possess in abundance, is a nasty arrogant attitude, they actually seriously think that they are doing a good job-and honestly believe they can do no wrong? The latest episode of stupidity is the announced demolition of the Jackson Landing-
Most if not all will certainly not admit to any mistakes- some will blatantly Lie- that they never said this or never said that- despite overwhelming evidence of their dishonest and outrageous comments-exist- it was NOT -my fault, is their cry, what is even more alarming is that they have the audacity to pass the buck, deny all and any involvement – in any controversial issue- even to delegate their functions- to even less qualified and experienced Council Staff, if that scenario is at all possible- an example is the Council Planning Committee- who do this often, particularly whenever any Controversial Planning application are submitted under the counter- for a consideration –of course-  such as my Objection- to- retrospective planning application H/2009/0568.-despite our objection it was  illegally built on our property- causing serious damage to our property- they hadn’t even applied for planning consent for their kitchen and toilet extension- but having friends in the know- where granted retrospective planning- permission-they even tried to alter our registered details of freehold property ownership- at Land Registry-Durham-despite having no credible documentary evidence- or proof of purchase of the freehold property built on- where as we have irrefutable documentary evidence of purchase-in all good faith- of the ex-council house freehold property-Title-CE74844 “Absolute” we purchased-from Hartlepool Borough Council-on the 1st February 1984-pursuant to the Housing act 1980-in consideration of £5.750.00-Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds--the Receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged by- HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL of Civic Centre Hartlepool-in the County of Cleveland (hereinafter called “the Transferor”) as beneficial owner hereby CONVEY to ALAN HARVEY FLOUNDERS & JACQUELINE FLOUNDERS-his-WIFE-both of 48-Ridlington Way-Hartlepool- aforesaid-(hereinafter called “the Transferee”) the Land-purchased- shown and edged in RED-on the title plan-number M44,684- dated –September 1983-bound-up-within-and with-the DWELLING-HOUSE-and Other Buildings-thereon known as Number 48 Ridlington Way-Hartlepool- the estate was -Conveyed, Transferred-Registered & Recorded in both the Property Register & the Proprietorship Register of the Land Title Register- by J Anthony Brown Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council-on behalf of the Sellers of the Freehold Property-on the 29th 3.1984-irrefutable -unchallengeable-documentary evidence of legal purchase & Ownership- BUT-completely ignored by Hartlepool Borough Council Planning and Legal Officials-What a copout- what intellectual cowardice, too: afraid to investigate allegations of Misconduct in public office- of Council Officials.
"This thing could not have occurred - without the Connivance and Collusion of Paid Officials in Hartlepool Borough Council and the Connivance and Collusion of Officials in the Land Registry Durham-

Tuesday, 14 June 2016

CORRUPTION & PERVERTING the COURSE OF JUSTICE-HARTLEPOOL STYLE


 

An explanation-WHY –I continue my Campaign- and WHY I have reported my Concerns to Cleveland Police-
 
PLEASE SHARE - remember just liking the post doesn't help spread it.

I don’t get a great deal of pleasure from exposing the Corruption in Hartlepool-but I believe it is necessary and in the public interest- when you discover some Councillors and Council officials not all I agree- are morally unfit to hold positions of authority in public office- they all get very well paid by the public to do a job- unfortunately-a few- start to believe their own publicity- they think they can do and say what they like- they even begin to think they are better than the average local- they also think they are above the law- they become big headed- supercilious –and arrogant- these scoundrels should be exposed- unfortunately some -Local authorities particularly Hartlepool-will in my opinion- always try and pass the buck but I think you will find that it is not possible when push comes to shove-particularly when you possess-as we do- the legal documents of Title- CE74844 “Absolute including the receipt for the purchase-of-the ex-council house-freehold-property- pursuant to the Housing Act 1980!  The best class of title to have is absolute.

This means that the proprietor’s right to the land is absolute and cannot be Challenged?-
 
I believe Peter Devlin Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council- should know the law-we are led to believe -he is -after all a Solicitor- particularly the Law regarding Purchase of Land & Property-sold by Hartlepool Borough Council-and bought by local citizens-consequently his silence- indicates-he is NOT taking my allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice & financial fraud-including abuse of Public Office-- by some of his Council Colleagues regarding our legal ownership of the registered freehold land and property-Title CE74844 “Absolute”- Seriously Enough - part of which was unlawfully given to our immediate next door neighbour-In my view- this Conduct in failing to pursue serious criminal offences reported to him-and I believe-Misconduct in a Public Office-Particularly his clear breach of  the Fraud Act 2006- Chapter 35-section 4-fraud by abuse of position-in which he is expected to Safeguard-or NOT act against-the financial interests of another person ? a breach of his standards professional behaviour in the areas of Honesty and Integrity-

Does he need to be reminded once again-that Hartlepool Borough Council- were the original sellers and mortgage holders-of the land and property that we originally purchased in all good faith from Hartlepool Borough Council in February 1984-Pursuant to the Housing Act 1980-in Consideration of Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds £5,759.00-the RECEIPT on the Land Registry-Official Copy- of the Document of Purchase.-is hereby acknowledged-by HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL-of the CIVIC CENTRE-HARTLEPOOL-
It was my understanding- has explained by our Solicitors-Levinson-Walker & Lister-that a Title Deed is a Legal Document by which Real Property is Owned, Sold and transferred-once the Land and Property is Purchased-Conveyed- transferred -recorded and registered by the Solicitor as was ours-by J Anthony Brown- Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council on the 29th /3/1984.with Land Registry- Durham- the Property Deed is Proof that the person named in it- owns the land described-edged in RED on the Deed Title Plan- and all of the buildings attached to it!  It was also my belief these entitlements are legally enforceable

This unfortunately does’nt appear to be the opinion of the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council-Peter Devlin- nor the Opinion of the LABOUR Member of Parliament – for Hartlepool- Iain Wright M.P. who was informed of the facts BUT remains SILENT- 
 
My continued research of the some Legal site on the Internet- has expose some interesting data-that I believe supports my allegation- that Alan H Smith-assistant Land Registrar-and Anthony- Lowes-both Officials -of Land Registry Durham- Colluded and Conspired -with Officials of Hartlepool Borough Council- namely--Alyson Carman-Solicitor and Complaints reviewer; Hilary Martin- Solicitor and Freedom of Information Officer- Richard Trow Project Planning Officer-Mr-Reece- Planning Development Manager-Paul Burgon-Enforcement Officer- to Pervert the Course of Justice-in Public Office- Particularly their  clear breach of  the Fraud Act 2006- Chapter 35-section 4-fraud by abuse of position-in which they-are- expected to Safeguard-or NOT act against-the financial interests of another person?
Here is Information readily available in the Public Domain-
Land Registry Proprietorship Register
 
The Land Registry’s register of land is made up of three sections, or registers, called the Property Register, Proprietorship Register and Charges Register. These three registers contain information as to the ownership of a particular piece of land, its extent, and any third party interests which affect it, such as mortgages, rights or covenants.

The proprietorship register tells us the legal owner(s) of the land and various other important pieces of information.  Proprietorship Register & Class of Title
 
1.       Firstly, the proprietorship register tells us the “class of title” which the land is registered with. There are six classes of title, three relating to freehold land and three to leasehold land. The freehold classes are absolute, qualified or possessory and the leasehold classes are absolute, good leasehold and qualified.

2.     The best class of title to have is absolute. This means that the proprietor’s right to the land is absolute and cannot be challenged.

3.      Possessory title is at the other end of the scale. This usually happens where the person who originally applied to register the land could not prove his ownership, either because he had lost the title deeds or he was claiming ownership through adverse possession (often termed “squatters’ rights”).

4.      Possessory title can be challenged by someone with a better claim to the land.

5.       
Next we have the name(s) of the Registered Proprietor(s). These are the legal owners of the land and except in exceptional circumstances (such as if a sole owner is bankrupt, the property has been repossessed or all owners are deceased) these are the people with power to transfer the property to a new owner.
There can be a maximum of four registered proprietors and a minimum of one. The date in brackets is the date on which the property was registered in the name of the current owners.
This will generally be several weeks after the date on which they actually completed their purchase.the Proprietorship Register may state the price paid by the current proprietors when they acquired the property. Any personal covenants; they are covenants which are only binding on the current proprietor, will be detailed here. The most common personal covenant found here is an indemnity covenant.The Proprietorship Register goes on to list any restrictions (entries which limit the way in which the proprietors can deal with the title) and bankruptcy notices.

If anything I have Written or Published is NOT TRUE why have NONE repeat NONE of the named Hartlepool Council Individuals Disputed any of my allegations-NOR Commenced ANY Legal Proceeding against ME for Slander-or whatever other crimes they can think of-?
If anyone named wishes to refute any of the allegations made against them-in a Court of law-they are of course-free to do so- indeed-I would welcome such action- I am led to believe from my internet research- a Council cannot sue for libel-(Derbyshire vs Sunday Times-House of Lords 1993) nor can it indemnify a Councillor or Council Officer who wished to sue an individual-(local authorities indemnity for members and officers) order 2004!
 If that is correct-they should be reminded-before deciding on such a Hazardous-Course of action-they will have to pay their own legal costs-and prove-in a Court of law-our Documents of purchase & Registration-to be fraudulent-? 10 years for Perjury- I think is the going rate at the moment!

Yours Sincerely
Alan Harvey Flounders

Tuesday, 14 June 2016