Friday, 17 March 2017

“IF YOU FIGHT YOU MIGHT LOSE-BUT IF YOU DON’T FIGHT -YOU WILL ALWAYS LOSE”-


 

Corruption in Labour Controlled Councils particularly in the North East is nothing new-

Dear Ms Alexander Hartlepool Borough Council Chief Executive,

I have sufficient factual & credible evidence of legal purchase from Hartlepool Borough Council in all good faith of my freehold Ex-Council House Land & Property, Registered Title CE74844 “Absolute” available to legally contest & challenge that obvious fabricated false claim- made by Alan H Smith assistant Land Registrar Durham- a government official employed in a public office in his letters to us signed and dated 5th December 2008 that -try and support his misleading statement without any factual evidence to support his claim- that a previous conveyance had taken place between the Mayor Aldermen and Burgesses of Hartlepool Borough Council and Mr/Mrs E Bennison in November 1972- despite repeatedly asking the chief solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council Peter Devlin to re-examine the fraudulent evidence of property ownership said by Hilary Martin the Freedom of Information Officer to have been examined by Hartlepool Council Planning and Legal Officials prior to the granting of approval- to the legally flawed Retrospective Planning application H/2009/0568- I am still awaiting a honest reply to that)

Can there be anything more contemptuous than the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Town Council Peter Devlin-and my Labour De Brus Ward Councillor-Bob Cooke- trying to wriggle out of their responsibilities by lying through their teeth. Those two (2) named people in Public and Elected office ( there are others) can only lie as blatantly and continually as this if they know they are doing so with impunity-courtesy of others in senior positions of authority- but obviously no principles?

There are several question worthy of answers on this matter, as a full Council Tax payer I would appreciate your explanation as to why- my legitimate questions as the Registered freehold property owners –I believe I am legally entitled to make- have been deliberately & continuously brushed under the carpet- who decided that this information should be withheld- it is now obvious that everyone  here
in Hartlepool can safely assume the "Nolan Principles" went out the window a long time back- particularly in this case
P.S.
I have always thought-that if any law abiding tax paying member of the general public- has irrefutable factual evidence -as I have- of financial fraud and misconduct in "Public Office" then the place to report it is to Cleveland Police-which I honestly believe I did-some time ago- also kept fully informed and given a copy of all my evidence of legal purchase- was my Labour Party Parliamentary representative in Westminster Iain Wright. (still awaiting for a reply from him on that) including one from the last Monkey elected Mayor of Hartlepool- Mr Drummond ? What good did it do? Heard he’s got a very good little earner now? Could be he knows where the bodies are buried?

Further information if needed can be found at alan harvey Flounders aka "Coffin Dodger" https://alanflounders.blogspot.co.uk/

Monday, 13 March 2017

POLITE REMINDER To :- Rt Hon:-Elizabeth Truss-M.P.@parliament.u.k.-Lord Chancellor

POLITE REMINDER THAT I AM STILL AWAITING A REPLY TO THE FOLLOWING FORMAL COMPLAINT SENT ON 14th OCTOBER 2016
To :- Rt Hon:-Elizabeth Truss-M.P.@parliament.u.k.-Lord Chancellor & Secretary of State for Justice (a combined position).

Dear Madam- Lord Chancellor- Secretary of State for Justice-

It Is My Understanding Obtained from My Research of the Internet- that the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) is a ministerial department of the UK Government headed by the-Lord Chancellor-and- Secretary of State for Justice (a combined position)

It Is also my-My Understanding that in Accordance to the Land Registration Act 1925, Land Registration-Act 2002-Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act1989- Land Registry’s Only Remit-is to Record All The Information Conveyed To Them By The Solicitors Acting On Behalf Of The Sellers Or Buyers of the Property-Land Registry-Have No Legal Remit-Or Legal Authority Whatsoever-To Alter Any Of The Details Submitted for Registration Of Any-Land /Property Bought Or Sold-By Conveyancing / Solicitors-
“It is therefore vital –in my view-–that the General Public have Confidence in their Public Officials –particularly Land Registry-Durham- and in the legal framework that sets the boundaries of their conduct.

There is urgent need- to ensure that public officials are appropriately held to account for misconduct committed in connection with their official duties-owing to the gravity of my serious allegation- of misconduct in public office-including-conspiracy to pervert the course of justice- by abuse of office-premeditated fraud-as outlined in the Fraud Act 2006-
Having exhausted all the known avenues of Complaint available to me-including the Labour Dominated Hartlepool Borough Council- the Chief Solicitor-of Hartlepool Peter Devlin-who knows of my Concerns of Freehold Property Ownership-and refuses to act- my Labour Party Representative in the Palace of Westminster- Iain Wright-who also knows of my Justifiable concerns- but-refuses to reply to my Letters of Protest
I consider these allegations are a grave-serious matter & should be brought to your- attention-as- the Lord Chancellor-& Secretary of State for Justice-without further delay-

I am reluctantly left with no alternative but to Summit a Formal Complaint to –you- Lord Chancellor & Secretary of State for Justice-to request you-Commence an in-depth Inquiry into my serious allegations of Gross Criminal Misconduct -Abuse of Position in Public Office-including-Property Fraud & attempting to Perverting the course of Justice, in Public Office of the following named-Land Registry-Durham- Government Officials- Alan H Smith-the assistant Land REGISTRAR- Durham-his colleague-Anthony Lowes-& Andrew Schofield-Office Manager-

Who for the past five years -have pursued & supported-(for reasons best known to themselves-) a ludicrous obvious vicious spurious claim made by a B141 applicants-first made- in October 2008- to alter some of the registered & recorded freehold property details –on the Registered Land Title CE74844 “Absolute” freehold ex council house land and property -we purchased in all good faith- pursuant to the Housing Act 1980- on the 1st February 1984-from Hartlepool Borough Council- in Consideration of £5.750.00 Pounds- (Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds) the RECEIPT acknowledged by Hartlepool Borough Council-& -transferred &  registered by the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council- J Anthony Jones- on the 29/3/1984-

Despite the above irrefutable documentary evidence as proof-of purchase-& Ownership- beyond any reasonable doubt-they-refuse-to believe-for reasons best known to themselves- but suspected by others-that the B141 application –made in October 2008-Is a Fraudulent Document-and outside Land Registry’s  Remit-

Is that not a Clear Deliberate Case of Misconduct In Public Office- by Officials- of Land Registry-Durham- to pervert the Course Of Justice-particularly the assistant Land Registrar-Alan H Smith-and his Colleagues-Anthony Lowes- who-it must be remembered-stated-“categorically” in his signed letter dated 5th December 2008- that a conveyance-of the property in question-had previously-taken place-between Mr/Mrs Bennison-and the Mayor-Aldermen and Burgesses of the County Borough of Hartlepool in November 1972-However-the same area of land was-together with other land conveyed to YOU on the 1st February 1984-by Hartlepool Borough Council-as the council had previously Sold Off-the land in November-1972- it could NOT repeat could NOT-subsequently have included it in a Conveyance to you in 1984- this means that -Mr/Mrs Bennison-have the better documentary title to the Land than you-


This statement of fact-made by Alan H Smith- assistant Land Registrar-Durham-that-Mr/Mrs Bennison-have the better documentary title to the Registered Freehold Land CE 74844 “Absolute” than you- without any substantive documentary evidence-whatsoever-is based on fallacious reasons-a deceptive mistaken and false belief- (Held for personal Reasons) that a Conveyance had previously taken place between Mr/Mrs Bennison and the Mayor-Aldermen and Burgees of Hartlepool Borough Council in November 1972-without any substantive- proof whatsoever -it  may also-explain and “Question” -(the reasons best known to Alan H Smith- himself-) his Continual Refusal to accept as Proof-of Purchase & Transfer-the-irrefutable- documentary evidence-presented-for inspection-of the Freehold Property-issued by Land Registry-Durham-themselves-dated 16thFebruary 1984- Confirming”-the Purchased-and Transfer-in all good faith-of the ex-council house freehold land and property-Registered Title CE74844 “Absolute” - pursuant to the Housing Act 1980-in “Consideration” of £5.750. (Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds) and the receipt-acknowledged by Hartlepool Borough Council-of Civic Centre-Hartlepool-Conveys-:-to Alan Harvey Flounders and his wife-Jacqueline Flounders-on the Pre-Sale of Council House-Title Plan-No.M44684-dated September 1983-the entire total area of land edged in RED-–Purchased-from Hartlepool Borough Council-Hartlepool- on 1st February 1984-bound up within and with the dwelling house- known as number 48 Ridlington Way-Hartlepool-

There is- in my view- Sufficient substantive-evidence to show-that-he Alan H Smith-the assistant Land REGISTRAR- employed in public office of a government department- assisted by his colleague-Anthony Lowes- with the assistance-of the- B141 applicants- Mr/Mrs Bennison- and Officials of Hartlepool Borough Council-Planning & Legal Departments-Peter Devlin- Chief Solicitor-of Hartlepool Borough Council- Alyson Carman-Solicitor& amp; Complaints reviewer Hilary Martin-Solicitor and Freedom of Information Officer-Richard Trow- Project Planning Officer—Mr Reece-Planning Development-Manager-Paul Burgon- Enforcement Officer-Collaborated& amp; Conspired to Pervert the Course of Justice- including-Criminal Deception-by abuse of Public Office- intending to deprive the legal owners of part of their registered title-by- Fraud as defined in the FRAUD Act. 2006-

(a)
“FRAUD BY FALSE REPRESENTATION” is defined by Section-2-of the Fraud Act-2006- as a case where a person makes “any representation as to fact or law-expressed or implied- which they know to be UNTRUE or MISLEADING-( i.e. Alan H Smith’s -Categorical claim-in his letter to us- signed and dated 5th December 2008- that a Conveyance of the property-had Previously Taken Place between Mr/Mrs Bennison- and the Mayor-Aldermen and Burgesses of the County Borough of Hartlepool-in November 1972)
(b)
“FRAUD BY ABUSE OF POSITION” is defined by Section 4-of the Act-as a case where a person occupies a position- i.e. assistant Land Registrar-Durham -a Public Office-where they are expected- to safeguard the financial interests of another person- and abuses that position- this includes cases where the abuse consisted of an omission- rather than an overt act—In all classes of Fraud-it requires that for an offence to have occurred-the person must have acted dishonestly- and that they acted- with the intent of making a gain for themselves-or anyone else- i.e. Mr/Mrs Bennison-or inflicting a loss-or risk of loss-on another-i.e.-us- the Registered Legal owners of the property-Alan Harvey Flounders and his Wife-Jacqueline Flounders
 
The HM Land Registry Adjudicator was established under the Land Registration Act 2002. The HM Land Registry Adjudicator resolves disputes about registered land by considering references from HM Land Registry following applications made to the HM Land Registry by members of the public- my question is as follows-

How can this be right- when the Officials-complained about-particularly the assistant land REGISTRAR- Alan H Smith- are themselves-employed in Land Registry-Durham- does anyone seriously believe they will report themselves for misconduct in Public Office-
There are many different and varied applications that may be made under the rules but the most common matters referred to the HM Land Registry Adjudicator are disputes about boundaries; easements or restrictive covenants; beneficial ownership of land; and, adverse possession claims.
The varied provisions of the Land Registration Rules 2003 deal with each different application. These Rules must be consulted prior to any application.

The formal procedure before the HM Land Registry Adjudicator is set out within the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry (Practice and Procedure) Rules 2003 as amended by the 2008 Rules.
Any hearing will be as local to the dispute as possible, normally at the tribunal centre closest to hand. A site visit will normally be held before the hearing. The hearings are adversarial and decisions will normally be reserved and handed down in writing within 28 days.
The HM Land Registry Adjudicator has the power to award costs in essentially the same way as under normal civil litigation. Any appeal from any decision of the HM Land Registry Adjudicator is to the Chancery Division of the High Court Permission to appeal is required from either the HM Land Registry Adjudicator or the High Court.!
Judicial Review of a decision to grant, grant subject to conditions, or refuse planning permission is an alternative to the statutory review available under s.288 of the 1990 Act (which can only be pursued if the applicant appeals to the Secretary of State as a preliminary step).
 The procedure is open to any third party of sufficient standing but the first stage of applying for leave to apply for judicial review acts as a filter to prevent unmeritorious applications. The application for leave is made ex parte and allows the applicant to establish whether or not there is an arguable case without incurring excessive liability for costs.

An applicant has to have a ‘sufficient interest” in the matter to which the application relates’.I believe as the Registered Purchasers of the Freehold Land &  Property –CE74844 “Absolute” purchased in all good faith- pursuant to the Housing Act 1980- on the 1st February 1984-from Hartlepool Borough Council- in consideration of £5.750.00 Pounds- (Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds) the RECEIPT acknowledged by Hartlepool Borough Council-& Transferred & Registered by the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council- J. Anthony Brown- on the 29/3/1984- gives us sufficient interest” in the matter.
Yours Sincerely
Alan Harvey Flounders
CC.
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government-Rt Hon Greg Clark MP-
Email: gregclarkmp@parliament.uk
Iain Wright-Labour -Member of Parliament for Hartlepool-
Peter Devlin-Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Council-
F.V.Clough-Land Registry-Durham-

Sunday, 27 November 2016

CORRUPTION IS still ALIVE AND KICKING IN LABOUR PARTY LED-HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL



Sunday 27/11/2016

Lets not forget-because some  Hartlepool Labour Councillors- have short memories Corruption is still very much alive and kicking in Hartlepool Labour Dominated Council- who can forget- that a Former Hartlepool LABOUR Councillor Angie Wilcox Pleaded Guilty To Fourteen Charges of Fraud, False Accounting and Theft totalling over £150,000.

Sentencing I believe-is  shortly To Take Place On 2nd December.
She should definitely get but won’t - more than the 20 year strech the Undertaker got-hope her evil friends get their just rewards-in the future- the stench of criminal corruption in Hartlepool Labour Party run Council is overpowering- Goggle the Coffin Dodger-or this Blog- 

Last Updated on Tuesday, 13 September 2016 of the Article published on Monday 12th September 2016.
CORRUPTION IS ALIVE AND KICKING IN LABOUR PARTY LED-HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL
More Evidence of Misconduct-for Peter Devlin –Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Council-to Ignore- & Brush under the Carpet-as Normal- to protect some of his colleagues –particularly Richard Trow- in the Planning Department–Hilary Martin &Alyson Carman-in the Legal Department of Hartlepool Borough Council-
The criteria for the unlawful decision-taken by Alan H Smith-assistant Land Registrar-Durham- to remove property details-from our Registered Land Title- CE74844 “Absolute” we purchased in all good faith from Hartlepool Borough Council on the 1stFebruary 1984- pursuant to the Housing Act 1980- in consideration of £5.750.00 –(Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds) can only be-based NOT on the LAW  of the Property Registration Act-but on “his personal  opinion” which is pure speculation- (speculation) -as we all know- is the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm irrefutable evidence-to support such a claim- but relies on the  spurious-claim-made by  the B141 applicants- when  stated categorically-( in a way that is unambiguously explicit and direct: ) in his signed and dated letter to us on the 3rd December 2008-that the area of land in question-was originally conveyed to Mr/Mrs Benison-by the Mayor-Aldermen and Burgess  of the County Borough of Hartlepool in November 1972  -
It Is My Understanding Obtained From My Research Of The Internet that in Accordance to The Land Registration Act1925,Land Registration-Act 2002, Law Of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989-
Land Registry’s Only Remit- is To Record All The Information Conveyed To Them By The Solicitors Acting On Behalf Of The Sellers Or Buyers Of The Property-Land Registry- Have No Legal Remit-Or Legal Authority Whatsoever-To Alter Any Of The Details Submitted for Registration Of Any-Land /Property Bought Or Sold-By Conveyancing / Solicitors-
It is disappointing though hardly surprising-or unexpected- that-Land Registry-Durham the recipients -of my request-for a copy of this Alleged Conveyance between the Mayor- Aldermen and–Burgesses of Hartlepool Council- &-Mr/Mrs Bennison-in November 1972- have found themselves unable to provide authentic proof of such a conveyance- could it possibly be-that- my previous protests-of misconduct in public office- are  justified-that NO-repeat NO Evidence-Exists-of any Previous Conveyance between the Mayor Aldermen and–Burgesses of Hartlepool Council- & Mr/Mrs Bennison-had ever taken place- in November 1972-
Alan H Smith-the assistant Land REGISTRAR- Durham (a Government Official in Public Office-) appears determined to pursue this ludicrous claim by the B141 applicants- despite the irrefutable evidence-that it is a fraudulent claim-and outside his Remit- disputes of property ownership can only be settled in a Court of Law-
Is that not a clear deliberate case of Misconduct In Public Office-by the assistant Land Registrar-Alan H Smith-and sufficient evidence-to show-he an assistant Land REGISTRAR- Conspired with the B141 applicants- and Officials of Hartlepool Borough Council- Planning& amp; Legal Departments-to obtain property by Criminal Deception- and to Pervert the Course of Justice- FRAUD-as defined in the FRAUD Act. 2006
(a)
“Fraud by false representation” is defined by Section-2-of the Act-as a case where a person makes “any representation as to fact or law-…expressed or implied- which they know to be untrue or misleading-( i.e. Alan H Smith’s claim-in his letter to us- signed and dated 3rd December 2008- that a conveyance of the property-had previously taken place between Mr/Mrs Bennison- and the Mayor-Aldermen and Burgesses of the County Borough of Hartlepool-in November 1972)
(b)
“Fraud by abuse of position” is defined by Section 4-of the Act-as a case where a person occupies a position- i.e. assistant Land Registrar-Durham -a Public Office-where they are expected- to safeguard the financial interests of another person- and abuses that position- this includes cases where the abuse consisted of an omission- rather than an overt act—In all classes of Fraud-it requires that for an offence to have occurred- the person must have acted dishonestly- and that they acted- with the intent of making a gain for themselves-or anyone else- i.e. Mr/Mrs Bennison-or inflicting a loss-or risk of loss-on another- i.e. the legal owners of the registered property-Alan Harvey Flounders and his Wife- Jacqueline Flounders-
You can’t hide your misconduct in Public Office for ever Peter- Devlin-you have been exposed-as unfit for office-by me-Alan Harvey Flounders-

"If anything I have written is untrue or slanderous- no-doubt Peter-Devlin will commence legal proceedings against me- I await your possible threat of litigation with pleasure-and anticipation-

It is also- my understanding- if you are going to Court in a litigation against your neighbour, and if your neighbour's case relies upon information contained in a Title Deed, then the Law- requires him/her to disclose that Title Deed-to us-(in fact -he/she- is required to disclose to us- any evidence- on which they seek to rely on)-particularly the alleged  Conveyance-supposedly made- between Mr/Mrs Bennison & the Mayor-Aldermen &Burgesses of County Borough of Hartlepool- in November 1972- surely this legal ruling-must also apply to Hartlepool Borough Council- the original “Sellers” and Mortgage Holders of the ex-council house- No Council can Legally sell the same piece of Freehold Property to Two ( 2) separate individuals-that must be Criminal Misconduct and Fraud-in Public Office
 
“It is vital that the public have confidence in their public officials and in the legal framework that sets the boundaries of their conduct. The offence of misconduct in public office-is a Criminal Offence-
There is urgent need to ensure that public officials are appropriately held to account for misconduct committed in connection with their official duties.”
Strange and highly suspicious when one considers that despite numerous requests for a copy of this controversial document of–Conveyance-to confirm the authenticity of Alan H Smith’s - statement our requests for a copy-of the Conveyance  allegedly made- in 1972- have been ignored-
If he Alan H Smith- and Land Registry-Durham- isn't able to ascertain the truth of a previous conveyance-having taken place-between –Mr/Mrs Benninson and the Mayor- Aldermen- and Burgesses of the County Borough of Hartlepool in November 1972- which-he had clearly and enthusiastically supported-previously- as sufficient evidence to alter some of our registered details on Land Title CE74844 “Absolute” -then he most certainly shouldn't be holding a public office in a government department-as an assistant Land Registrar-of Land Registry Durham-

Friday, 14 October 2016

General Public should have Confidence in their Public Officials –particularly Land Registry-Durham-

POLITE REMINDER THAT I AM STILL AWAITING A REPLY TO THE FOLLOWING FORMAL COMPLAINT SENT ON 14th OCTOBER 2016
To :- Rt Hon:-Elizabeth Truss-M.P.@parliament.u.k.-Lord Chancellor & Secretary of State for Justice (a combined position).

Dear Madam- Lord Chancellor- Secretary of State for Justice-

It Is My Understanding Obtained from My Research of the Internet- that the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) is a ministerial department of the UK Government headed by the-Lord Chancellor-and- Secretary of State for Justice (a combined position)

It Is also my-My Understanding that in Accordance to the Land Registration Act 1925, Land Registration-Act 2002-Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act1989- Land Registry’s Only Remit-is to Record All The Information Conveyed To Them By The Solicitors Acting On Behalf Of The Sellers Or Buyers of the Property-Land Registry-Have No Legal Remit-Or Legal Authority Whatsoever-To Alter Any Of The Details Submitted for Registration Of Any-Land /Property Bought Or Sold-By Conveyancing / Solicitors-
“It is therefore vital –in my view-–that the General Public have Confidence in their Public Officials –particularly Land Registry-Durham- and in the legal framework that sets the boundaries of their conduct.

There is urgent need- to ensure that public officials are appropriately held to account for misconduct committed in connection with their official duties-owing to the gravity of my serious allegation- of misconduct in public office-including-conspiracy to pervert the course of justice- by abuse of office-premeditated fraud-as outlined in the Fraud Act 2006-
Having exhausted all the known avenues of Complaint available to me-including the Labour Dominated Hartlepool Borough Council- the Chief Solicitor-of Hartlepool Peter Devlin-who knows of my Concerns of Freehold Property Ownership-and refuses to act- my Labour Party Representative in the Palace of Westminster- Iain Wright-who also knows of my Justifiable concerns- but-refuses to reply to my Letters of Protest
I consider these allegations are a grave-serious matter & should be brought to your- attention-as- the Lord Chancellor-& Secretary of State for Justice-without further delay-

I am reluctantly left with no alternative but to Summit a Formal Complaint to –you- Lord Chancellor & Secretary of State for Justice-to request you-Commence an in-depth Inquiry into my serious allegations of Gross Criminal Misconduct -Abuse of Position in Public Office-including-Property Fraud & attempting to Perverting the course of Justice, in Public Office of the following named-Land Registry-Durham- Government Officials- Alan H Smith-the assistant Land REGISTRAR- Durham-his colleague-Anthony Lowes-& Andrew Schofield-Office Manager-

Who for the past five years -have pursued & supported-(for reasons best known to themselves-) a ludicrous obvious vicious spurious claim made by a B141 applicants-first made- in October 2008- to alter some of the registered & recorded freehold property details –on the Registered Land Title CE74844 “Absolute” freehold ex council house land and property -we purchased in all good faith- pursuant to the Housing Act 1980- on the 1st February 1984-from Hartlepool Borough Council- in Consideration of £5.750.00 Pounds- (Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds) the RECEIPT acknowledged by Hartlepool Borough Council-& -transferred &  registered by the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council- J Anthony Jones- on the 29/3/1984-

Despite the above irrefutable documentary evidence as proof-of purchase-& Ownership- beyond any reasonable doubt-they-refuse-to believe-for reasons best known to themselves- but suspected by others-that the B141 application –made in October 2008-Is a Fraudulent Document-and outside Land Registry’s  Remit-

Is that not a Clear Deliberate Case of Misconduct In Public Office- by Officials- of Land Registry-Durham- to pervert the Course Of Justice-particularly the assistant Land Registrar-Alan H Smith-and his Colleagues-Anthony Lowes- who-it must be remembered-stated-“categorically” in his signed letter dated 5th December 2008- that a conveyance-of the property in question-had previously-taken place-between Mr/Mrs Bennison-and the Mayor-Aldermen and Burgesses of the County Borough of Hartlepool in November 1972-However-the same area of land was-together with other land conveyed to YOU on the 1st February 1984-by Hartlepool Borough Council-as the council had previously Sold Off-the land in November-1972- it could NOT repeat could NOT-subsequently have included it in a Conveyance to you in 1984- this means that -Mr/Mrs Bennison-have the better documentary title to the Land than you-

This statement of fact-made by Alan H Smith- assistant Land Registrar-Durham-that-Mr/Mrs Bennison-have the better documentary title to the Registered Freehold Land CE 74844 “Absolute” than you- without any substantive documentary evidence-whatsoever-is based on fallacious reasons-a deceptive mistaken and false belief- (Held for personal Reasons) that a Conveyance had previously taken place between Mr/Mrs Bennison and the Mayor-Aldermen and Burgees of Hartlepool Borough Council in November 1972-without any substantive- proof whatsoever -it  may also-explain and “Question” -(the reasons best known to Alan H Smith- himself-) his Continual Refusal to accept as Proof-of Purchase & Transfer-the-irrefutable- documentary evidence-presented-for inspection-of the Freehold Property-issued by Land Registry-Durham-themselves-dated 16thFebruary 1984- Confirming”-the Purchased-and Transfer-in all good faith-of the ex-council house freehold land and property-Registered Title CE74844 “Absolute” - pursuant to the Housing Act 1980-in “Consideration” of £5.750. (Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds) and the receipt-acknowledged by Hartlepool Borough Council-of Civic Centre-Hartlepool-Conveys-:-to Alan Harvey Flounders and his wife-Jacqueline Flounders-on the Pre-Sale of Council House-Title Plan-No.M44684-dated September 1983-the entire total area of land edged in RED-–Purchased-from Hartlepool Borough Council-Hartlepool- on 1st February 1984-bound up within and with the dwelling house- known as number 48 Ridlington Way-Hartlepool-
There is- in my view- Sufficient substantive-evidence to show-that-he Alan H Smith-the assistant Land REGISTRAR- employed in public office of a government department- assisted by his colleague-Anthony Lowes- with the assistance-of the- B141 applicants- Mr/Mrs Bennison- and Officials of Hartlepool Borough Council-Planning & Legal Departments-Peter Devlin- Chief Solicitor-of Hartlepool Borough Council- Alyson Carman-Solicitor & Complaints reviewer Hilary Martin-Solicitor and Freedom of Information Officer-Richard Trow- Project Planning Officer—Mr Reece-Planning Development-Manager-Paul Burgon- Enforcement Officer-Collaborated & Conspired to Pervert the Course of Justice- including-Criminal Deception-by abuse of Public Office- intending to deprive the legal owners of part of their registered title-by- Fraud as defined in the FRAUD Act. 2006-
(a)
“FRAUD BY FALSE REPRESENTATION” is defined by Section-2-of the Fraud Act-2006- as a case where a person makes “any representation as to fact or law-expressed or implied- which they know to be UNTRUE or MISLEADING-( i.e. Alan H Smith’s -Categorical claim-in his letter to us- signed and dated 5th December 2008- that a Conveyance of the property-had Previously Taken Place between Mr/Mrs Bennison- and the Mayor-Aldermen and Burgesses of the County Borough of Hartlepool-in November 1972)
(b)
“FRAUD BY ABUSE OF POSITION” is defined by Section 4-of the Act-as a case where a person occupies a position- i.e. assistant Land Registrar-Durham -a Public Office-where they are expected- to safeguard the financial interests of another person- and abuses that position- this includes cases where the abuse consisted of an omission- rather than an overt act—In all classes of Fraud-it requires that for an offence to have occurred-the person must have acted dishonestly- and that they acted- with the intent of making a gain for themselves-or anyone else- i.e. Mr/Mrs Bennison-or inflicting a loss-or risk of loss-on another-i.e.-us- the Registered Legal owners of the property-Alan Harvey Flounders and his Wife-Jacqueline Flounders
 
The HM Land Registry Adjudicator was established under the Land Registration Act 2002. The HM Land Registry Adjudicator resolves disputes about registered land by considering references from HM Land Registry following applications made to the HM Land Registry by members of the public- my question is as follows-
How can this be right- when the Officials-complained about-particularly the assistant land REGISTRAR- Alan H Smith- are themselves-employed in Land Registry-Durham- does anyone seriously believe they will report themselves for misconduct in Public Office-
There are many different and varied applications that may be made under the rules but the most common matters referred to the HM Land Registry Adjudicator are disputes about boundaries; easements or restrictive covenants; beneficial ownership of land; and, adverse possession claims.
The varied provisions of the Land Registration Rules 2003 deal with each different application. These Rules must be consulted prior to any application.
The formal procedure before the HM Land Registry Adjudicator is set out within the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry (Practice and Procedure) Rules 2003 as amended by the 2008 Rules.
Any hearing will be as local to the dispute as possible, normally at the tribunal centre closest to hand. A site visit will normally be held before the hearing. The hearings are adversarial and decisions will normally be reserved and handed down in writing within 28 days.
The HM Land Registry Adjudicator has the power to award costs in essentially the same way as under normal civil litigation. Any appeal from any decision of the HM Land Registry Adjudicator is to the Chancery Division of the High Court Permission to appeal is required from either the HM Land Registry Adjudicator or the High Court.!
Judicial Review of a decision to grant, grant subject to conditions, or refuse planning permission is an alternative to the statutory review available under s.288 of the 1990 Act (which can only be pursued if the applicant appeals to the Secretary of State as a preliminary step).
 The procedure is open to any third party of sufficient standing but the first stage of applying for leave to apply for judicial review acts as a filter to prevent unmeritorious applications. The application for leave is made ex parte and allows the applicant to establish whether or not there is an arguable case without incurring excessive liability for costs.
An applicant has to have a ‘sufficient interest” in the matter to which the application relates’.I believe as the Registered Purchasers of the Freehold Land &  Property –CE74844 “Absolute” purchased in all good faith- pursuant to the Housing Act 1980- on the 1st February 1984-from Hartlepool Borough Council- in consideration of £5.750.00 Pounds- (Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds) the RECEIPT acknowledged by Hartlepool Borough Council-& Transferred & Registered by the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council- J. Anthony Brown- on the 29/3/1984- gives us sufficient interest” in the matter.
Yours Sincerely
Alan Harvey Flounders
CC.
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government-Rt Hon Greg Clark MP-
Email: gregclarkmp@parliament.uk
Iain Wright-Labour -Member of Parliament for Hartlepool-
Peter Devlin-Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Council-
F.V.Clough-Land Registry-Durham-