SUPRISE SUPRISE -IAIN WRIGHT, MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT FOR HARTLEPOOL -SENDS ME AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT -

Wednesday, 01 June 2016

Surprise Surprise- I -Have just received -would you believe an   acknowledgement –at last- from Iain Wright –M.P. for Hartlepool- to a recent critical letter I sent to him on Sunday 8th May-2016. In which he says the contents have been noted- that’s it- noted-

To avoid any further misunderstanding I wish-to publish the contents of my letter I sent to Iain Wright M.P.– on here to-day- and wait and  see if any action--is taken against me for telling the truth-and criticising his conduct- he has known about my allegations of misconduct by officials of both Land Registry Durham and Planning Officials of Hartlepool Borough Council-including the Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough Council-Peter Devlin- for a number of years- and has done nothing- absolutely nothing-  both of these people- can never say- they didn't know who was the Legal owner of the Ex-Council House property

This letter was I believe both courteous and truthful-but like all the others I have sent -will be completely ignored-

Sunday 8th May 2016

Dear Sir,

Corruption –still festering away-in Hartlepool Labour Dominated Borough Council –

At last -the oxygen of publicity has put a spotlight on the Corruption--in Hartlepool Labour Dominated Borough Council –

 

Ask yourself this -How can a Chief Solicitor of Hartlepool Borough

Council-Peter Devlin- despite having a copy of the legal conveyance and a copy of a receipt-from Hartlepool Borough Council- acknowledging- the price paid -Pursuant to the Housing Act-1980- in “Consideration of “Five Thousand Seven Hundred & Fifty Pounds-£5,750” for the ex-council house Land & Property- highlighted on the Title Plan in RED- is still trying-would you believe- to hide the fact that a number of his colleague-Richard Trow-Paul Burgon & Mr Reece- in the Hartlepool Council- Planning Department- & -Alyson Carman-& Hilary Martin- of the Legal- Departments –acted Dishonestly in Public Office- when Granting-a Certificate of Lawfulness & Retrospect Planning Permission to a Planning Applicant H/2009/0568 -knowing-as they were the original owners and Sellers of the Council House Property- the retrospective planning application contained fraudulent & misleading claims of Freehold Property Purchase &  ownership-

a Statutory Requirement- of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990- sections 65(5) & 65(6) for- part of a Kitchen Extension erected-without seeking- Hartlepool- council planning-permission- and attached-it-to the immediate neighboursPrivate -property-causing severe structural damage if that doesn’t STINK of CORRUPTION- and the FAVOURABLE and PREFERENTIAL Treatment Previously given to these Retrospective Planning applicants- then we are all going to HELL in a WHEEL-BARROW -

We want the public to know that this isn’t about money, I have already returned to Land Registry-London- the sum of £300.pounds awarded to us until this disgraceful theft of freehold property is rectified- the truth is we scrimped and saved to buy our 3 bedroomed ex- council house-and have no intension of allowing a few dishonest despicable un-elected Hartlepool Council Officials-& a few Government Officials employed at Land Registry-Durham- namely the assistant Land Registrar-  Alan H Smith- and Anthony Lowes- to conspire with the others particularly the Retrospective Planning applicant and Officials of Hartlepool Borough Council- to pervert the Course of Justice- to commit fraud-,in Public Office-& rob us of part of our legally purchased -Freehold Land & Property purchased in all good faith- on the 1^st February 1984- pursuant to the Housing Act 1980 and in Consideration of “Five Thousand Seven Hundred And Fifty Pounds-£5,750.00”- registered-Land Title CE74844 “Absolute”

Yours Sincerely

Alan Harvey Flounders

My reference above to preferential treatment for example are these-

 

(a) to avoid the horrendous financial costs incurred by the Retrospective Planning applicants H/2009/0568 to demolish their illegal kitchen extension would have been astronomical-?

Does any level headed normal person still doubt that my allegations that the Retrospective Planning Applicant H/2009/0568 was again- shown Special Preferential and Privileged Treatment- don’t forget –they were allowed if not  encouraged to run and  operate a successful profit making taxi business from their Council House-strictly prohibited by their council house tenancy agreement and the covenants of the property- and what inducement other than money -you might well ask- was employed to receive that extra Special Treatment ? -

Just imagine- if some arrogant-I’ve got- more money than you-and have some-very-important-influential friends on Hartlepool  Council-so none of the planning rules or property laws apply to us- built- a un-safe- ugly monstrosity next door to you.-and attached to the rear wall of your detached outside wash-house-preventing your family the safe use of the -Wash House facilities-which- remember- you had  bought and paid-for-from Hartlepool Council in February 1984 !  Pursuant to the Housing Act 1980 in Consideration of Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds-£5,750.00.  

What do you do-about it-Do you lay down and accept it! –I don't think that would be your real honest- response, would it?

If anything I have Written or Published is NOT TRUE why have NONE repeat NONE of the named Hartlepool Council Individuals Disputed any of my allegations-NOR Commenced ANY Legal Proceeding against ME for Slander, or whatever other crimes they can think of-?

If anyone named wishes to refute any of the allegations made against them-in a Court of law-they are of course-free to do so- indeed-I would welcome such action-they should be reminded- they will have to pay the own legal costs-